Matthew 1:16, 18-21, 24a; 2 Samuel 7:4, 8-16
There's something a little bit queer about this story of Jesus' father, wouldn't you say? And by queer I'm using the word as it's understood in queer theory and queer theology. In these fields, "queer" is a way of thinking about, interpreting, and framing relationships so that cis-het normative standards are intentionally disrupted. In other words, where the world and the church would lift up a biological mother and biological father and biologically related children as the ideal and only norm for a family, based on the two (and only two) parents both being cis-gendered and heterosexual, with offspring that are genetically related to those two parents, queer studies and queer communities push back at that configuration. Not because it's immoral or bad but because that standard is held up as the cultural, legal, ethical, and religious norm to which all other family configurations must conform. It's the imposition of of the standard of cis-het, genetically related "nuclear families" on others that's the problem, not only because it becomes totalizing but because it harms those who don't live that way. To say something is queer is to, yes, reference the joyfully unexpected nature of something that isn't conforming, but also to resist totalizing norms.
And so, this story about Joseph is a little bit queer. For one thing, there's the genealogical inclusion of Joseph and his placement in the line of Jesus' ancestors. Joseph is the only one who is listed as the husband of anyone, and he is notably not described as Jesus' father. We know why, but it's worth pointing out. There are fourteen generations of "so-and-so the father of so-and-so" before the deportation to Babylon, and then a subsequent list of "so-and-so the father of so-and-so" for the next twelve generations and then "Joseph the husband of Mary, who bore Jesus." It's quite the disruption of a line that, for twenty-six generations, is built on biological fatherhood.
This is followed by the queerness of the story of Jesus' birth - fathered not by a human, but by God through the Holy Spirit. Jesus has no biological dad. Call it asexual reproduction––call it parthenogenesis––call it odd––call it a miracle, but there it is. Unsurprisingly, Joseph initially doesn't seem to believe that that's actually what happened. Which is totally fair. Now the customary process at that time when dealing with woman suspected of adultery was to send her to the Temple for an invasive physical exam by the Temple priests. (Babylonian Talmud, Sotah 2a) Joseph does not exercise that option, and chooses to end the marriage privately, being "unwilling to expose Mary to public disgrace." The Matthean Gospel writer calls Joseph "righteous" for this decision. In a world that treated women not as people, but as vessels to continue the male lineage, Joseph's decision to protect Mary's dignity is another queer act.
And while Joseph isn't queer for obeying the angel of the Lord who tells him to stay with Mary, the larger narrative around him is certainly odd in that Joseph is named as the father of Jesus, and so is God. Two fathers, neither of whom are biologically related to their Son, Jesus. These are some queer fathers.
It's important to name this, and to proclaim that this is how God has arranged Jesus' birth, because the image of father, particularly as it has been shaped by cis-het normativity in often toxic ways, is hurtful for many people. This is a tension that Christians grapple with - the Bible uses the word "Father" and fatherly imagery for God everywhere. It's unavoidable. And yet too many people's experiences with fathers is the very opposite of the goodness and the supportiveness and the protective nature of God that the Bible puts forward as fatherly.
Now one way to resolve this tension is to say that God is the ultimate father and human fathers are supposed to imitate God and humans fail and we shouldn't confuse our experience with human fathers with the Divine father. Which is fair – Karl Barth rightly warns against us imposing our human images on God. But it's easier said than done. And when we are called to minister to someone who is in crisis because of the harm caused by an earthly father, that is not the time to tell them about Karl Barth and the Otherness of God.
Another way to resolve this tension is to stop calling God Father. To call God Creator, or Parent, or even Mother. This is also fair – again to lean on Barth, the language we use for God is so completely separate from who God is that we can call God whatever is meaningful to us and it won't change who God is. But again, when we are called to minister to people in crisis, especially those who yearn for a God who is good and supportive and protective in a way that they understand fathers to be, that is not the time to disrupt the tradition of faith on which they lean and call God Mother.
And so we come back again to Joseph, the queer father. Co-fathering with God, who is also a queer Father. By calling Joseph to be the named father of Jesus, God demonstrates God's queerness: God's blessing of and invitation to family relationships that are outside the world's cis-het normative standards. And this isn't the first time God stands in the place of co-father. It's also there in our first reading from 2 Samuel. God tells Nathan to tell David that God is going to be the father of David's sons. "I will raise up your offspring after you, who shall come forth from your body. .. I will be a father to him, and he shall be a son to me." (2 Sam 7:12, 14a) Yes, we can read this as spiritual fatherhood, and that's been the practice for centuries, but that doesn't make it less queer. Saying God is the spiritual father and David is the biological and ancestral father still resists the cis-het biological normativity of fatherhood. It's still queer.
And thought the Bible is the precedent, we see it today. The queer Father God sends queer human fathers into the world to care for us, to help us to know the love of God through the love of these individuals who queerly father: step-fathers, foster fathers, older brothers who father (and I'll direct you to Genesis 43:29 where the first Joseph, calls his younger brother Benjamin, "my son"). God sends us uncles who father, single mothers who also take on fathering, adoptive fathers, all kinds of people who are not our biological fathers and yet whom God places in our lives to take on the role of supporting and protecting and providing for and raising us the way God the Creator does. Stepping into the pain that cis-het normative definitions of father inflict, God sends queer fathers who are righteous (and who teach us that righteousness as Joseph clearly taught Jesus), who step back so that their children can step forward, who support their partners, who uphold the dignity of mothers, who raise children who will heal the world. God sends these queer fathers, and is our queer Father, so that we might all experience God's love for us.
On this feast day of Joseph, the queer father of Jesus, we thank God for those people in the world whose fathering demonstrates alternatives to harmful cis-het normativity and we praise God, our Queer Father in heaven, who blesses us with love through one another and through His Son, Jesus Christ. Amen.